Matt at From the Morning interviews staunch "emerging church" opponent Frank Turk. This is an interesting interview, since the questions are definitely geared towards people in the emergent way of thinking. Turk, while I have several points of disagreement with him, takes the opportunity to make some very astute observations. Here's my favorite: Emergent Interviews: Frank Turk: To some degree, I think Turk's criticism is mistargeted -- that is, some of the views he is criticizing do exist (possibly even within Emergent), and are a problem, but are neither defining nor representative of what emerging christianity is. On the other hand, it seems that even people who identify with "emerging christianity" have trouble defining what, exactly, it is. I'll try to write more about that later... |
Comments:Comments: Centuri0n,
I've never been completely sure what exactly was meant by "emerging church," which is why I've never described myself that way (in fact, I would be kind of surprised if more than a handful of people at my church had ever even heard the term used -- so I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "you guys." That said, Frank's criticism seems to be directed more at liberal theology than at the emerging church -- the term "emerging" with respect to religion is typically used to describe a method rather than a theology (again, I'm not exatly certain of what method). The point is that the same method applied to literalist theology is no less "emergent" as when applied to liberal theology. I think that people hear assertions like "the emerging church isn't about theology" and interpret that as "emerging churches don't care about theology." This isn't true; it's just that emerging methods -- of reasoning, of relating to people, and of putting one's theology into practice -- can be used across a wide variety of theologies. I don't doubt that many people who use the term are more theologically liberal than you or Mr. Turk -- certainly not "the new puritans". The thing is, so are most mainline denominations and a significant chunk of evangelical christians. What you are arguing against is not the emerging church -- it is the much larger issue of theological liberalism, which is pretty much orthogonal to the question of emerging vs. non-emerging. Comment from Connor Carney [Member] 09/04/06, 22:18 Leave a comment: |

One of the most pervasive problems with atheists (stick with me here) is that they constantly -- and by constantly, I mean "every time they open their mouths" -- misunderstand or misrepresent the Gospel. Now, as a guy who is apologetically inclined, I love to say, "that comment is neither defining nor representative of what the Gospel says," but then I define the Gospel to clear it up.
Clear it up for me. If I am wrong and you guys are the new Puritans, I'll admit it. But if I'm right, you giuys have more than a lot of 'splainin' to do: you have a serious internal problem to which you are completely blind.
Comment from centuri0n [Visitor] · http://centuri0n.blogspot.com
09/02/06, 22:28